RGHF Rotary Global History Fellowship

 

"Slowly, we seek to serve others, believing that history will encourage membership retention and increase contributions to The Rotary Foundation."

HISTORYGLOBALDISTRICTCLUBMISSINGLIBRARYHARRISPEACETRFPHILOSOPHYPRESIDENTSCONVENTIONSNEWCOMMITTEEJOINemailFORUMSEARCHRGHF RGHF is not responsible for Google translation errors

ROTARY GLOBAL HISTORY SECTION HOME ROTARY GLOBAL HISTORY HISTORY OUTLINE SEARCH

FIRST IN EACH REGION

RI ARCHIVES CHICAGO

FIRST 100

AFRICA

 ASIA
AUSTRALIA CANADA EUROPE IRELAND/UK LATIN AMERICA NEW ZEALAND
HISTORY CALENDAR DISTRICT HISTORIES CONFLICT RIP CLUBS RI CONV CLUBS REGIONAL HISTORIES
WORLD MAP DIST, CLUBS, & COUNTRIES COMMITTEE WHAT'S NEW? UPDATES DISCUSSION Be a Webmaster

Also see our 2001 Census of the First 100 Clubs, Relinquishing Territory, Why One Only, and "More Than One Club in a Community?"

WHY ONE ONLY?

In the late 1920s and early 1930s, there was much discussion about encouraging Clubs to give ground in large cities for the formation of more clubs. In 1930 at the height of the argument, Will Moffatt wrote an article 'Why One Only?"' in the 'Rotary Wheel' strongly propounding the advantages of doing just this, and in April 1930, the magazine received this reply from Paul Harris:

"My dear Will.

While in exile in a small town in the West, your 'Why One Only?' came to me.

The tendency towards slavish adherence to precedent only stands in the way - the present plan has nothing whatever except precedent to recommend it. Otherwise it is sheer nonsense. As Rufe (Rufus) Chapin once remarked:

'There can be a score of Rotary Clubs in the down-town district of Chicago - several for each day of the week and each being of advantage to the others.

Bowl this thing over in Great Britain. Needless and purposeless limitation is immoral. Will you not be the Moses to lead us out of this wilderness?"

Sincerely yours

Paul P Harris

A London Rotarian, Stanley Leverton, later to be PRIBI in 1952, had visited Chicago in 1927 as a member of the R.I. Extension Committee and while there, guested at the Chicago Club. Afterwards he wrote: "As a nation of course, America thinks big and acts big. I am wondering if you sometimes act too big. The impression I have formed in Chicago leads me to wonder how long this organising on such an enormous scale will continue. Is there not a danger that you will over-organise and over-develop?"

What he proposed on his return applied initially to London and prompted Will Moffatt to write his article, recommending a more widespread application. of Leverton's principle. This in turn prompted a letter of support from Paul Harris. Leverton's plan suggested that clubs (babies) could be formed within the territory of another (mother) club who would still retain recruiting rights in the ceded area. In 1933 a resolution was passed at the Convention accepting some of his views, but even in London the opposition blocked any attempt to put it into practice. In 1943, however, at the St Louis Convention, RI formally incorporated the Leverton Plan into its constitution.

Researched and written by RGHF Senior Historian Basil Lewis, UK, 4 May 2007

 
 

Become a member of Rotary Global History Fellowship for only $30 USD. Dues support internet, membership services, and convention costs. Click here to join!

RGHF Disclaimer  Privacy Policy  Usage Agreement

The contents of this website, our electronic features and newsletters have been researched, collected, compiled, and written by Rotarians.

RGHF Mission: As an effort to serve others, RGHF accumulates and preserves the complete history, values and philosophy of the Rotary movement, as well as encourages others to do the same at every level of the Rotary movement, and publishes those histories, values and philosophies on the internet, as well as other forms of media as expedient. 17 March 2003, amended 20 December 2007, Rotary Global History Fellowship Board of Directors.

This fellowship is not an agency of, or controlled by, Rotary International, but is affiliated with individual Rotary districts, clubs, other Rotary organizations and enjoys the support of Rotarians, clubs, districts, and zones world-wide. The views and opinions expressed on this website are not necessarily the collective views and opinions of Rotary International or all Rotarians. Rotary International is not responsible for any content and accepts no liability therefore. © 2000-2008 RGHF (Rotary Global History Fellowship)